The
Wall Street Journal calls them the
“forgotten Americans.” Others see them as racist and xenophobic.
Then aspiring-President Obama characterized them in 2008 in the
following way: "And it's not
surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion
or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their
frustrations." Whether they are forgotten, dismissed, or
demonized, the “white working class” has been discovered this
election season.
As
with any new species, researchers are scrambling to probe, dissect,
and analyze white workers; pundits are spinning theories about their
habits and dispositions; and politicians are searching for keys to
unlock their votes.
Arguably,
no social segment has been under the sociological microscope this
intensely since US elites and their intellectual courtiers
“discovered” African Americans some sixty years ago. Class, like
race, must force itself on to the stage before notice is taken.
In
the case of the “white working class,” the surprising success of
Bernie Sanders on the left flank and Donald Trump on the right
flank-- successes that, in part, are believed to owe something to
white workers-- sparked the new interest.
Even
a decade ago, it was widely believed that there was no working class
in the US-- only a vast middle class and the poor. Fostered by social
scientists, mainstream politicians, and union functionaries, the
fiction prevailed that, apart from the very rich, everyone was either
middle class or poor. Of course this illusion began to shatter in the
wake of the 2008 crash and the ensuing economic stagnation. Likewise,
the rebellion against corporate, cookie-cutter candidates in the 2016
primary fights exposed a class division that poorly fit the
harmonious picture of one big class with insignificant extremes at
the margin.
Whatever
else the 2016 electoral campaigns have revealed, they surely have
shattered the illusion that the US is largely a classless society.
But
US elites and their opinion-making toadies struggle to find the
“white working class.” Some accounts refer to them as “white
males without a college degree,” still others, “middle-aged white
males.” The Brookings Institute takes a small, but confused step
closer to insight, by adding “the
additional qualification of being paid by the hour or by the job
rather than receiving a salary.”
Vulgar,
crude characterizations reach heights of stereotypicality and
ignorant simplicity: “Moreover, the political stuff they like –
bombastic attacks on Mexicans, Muslims, and Megyn Kelly – can turn
off minorities and college-educated whites, particularly women.”
Just
as the mass media has fostered caricatures of African-Americans, the
media and cultural/entertainment corporations craft an unflattering
image of white, working class citizens. Where Black people are
saddled with imagery of violence, idleness, promiscuity, and
criminality, white workers are portrayed as bigoted, socially,
culturally and intellectually backward, superstitious, and
conservative.
One
would never know from “hood” movies, talk radio hysteria, and the
crime-obsessed news readers, that most African Americans are a
significant part of the working class, maintain stable households,
and work diligently for a better life.
Similarly,
most white workers are neither gun fanatics nor Bible-thumpers. Most
white workers do not attack gays, abuse their spouses and children,
raze mosques or lynch Black People.
Nonetheless, both caricatures are
part of the baggage borne by elites, including liberal elites.
The
common perception dished by the mass media is that white workers
constitute the electoral base for Donald Trump, when the truth is
that the median household income for Trump’s primary voters was
$72,000. In truth, the nativist, anti-immigrant sentiments associated
with Trump are more typical of the white petty-bourgeoisie than the
white working class.
Certainly
media elites, pundits, and politicians do not want to talk about the
latent rebelliousness of the white working class-- a large majority
of white workers believe that the country is heading in the wrong
direction, an opinion that should not surprise anyone given the fact
that the median household income in the US has declined by 7% since
2000. Unfortunately, the current crisis of political credibility
shows that they, like most of the rest of the population, have yet to
find a way out.
Social
scientists have begun to acknowledge the toll that corporate pillage
has taken on the working class, very dramatically of recent in the case of the
white working class. Death rates, especially from alcoholism, drug
use, and suicide have risen sharply among white workers. The
institutions that formerly traded a measure of privilege to white
workers for their compliance and docility have now abandoned them.
The Democratic Party, for example, is so thoroughly corrupted by
corporate money that there is little more than gestures for the
causes of workers of every ethnicity.
Yes,
there is an element of lost privilege that fuels white working class
anger and despair. At the same time, the economic advantages that
separated white from Black workers in the past are diminishing in many sectors and
afford a rare opportunity to unite workers against their common
foe. Until the left and workers’ organizations undertake that task,
working class rebellion may well succumb to false friends and
bombastic demagogues.
Nothing
reveals the distance of the upper classes from the realities of
working class life like the current media fascination with the book
Hillbilly
Elegy
by J.D. Vance. Writing as one of their own, J.D. Vance-- a principal
at an investment firm-- relates his unhappy working class childhood
to book club liberals and country club conservatives.
Feeding the
stereotypes, Vance exposes a dysfunctional childhood spared from ruin
by an enlistment in the Marine Corps, a stint at Ohio State
University, and a climb to the summit, Yale Law School. Looking down
from the rarified air of Yale, he feels qualified to speak of “the
anger and frustration of the white working class” and the hunger to
“have someone tell their story.” The thirty-one-year-old
investment executive’s rags-to-riches tale urges “people to hold
themselves responsible for their own conduct and choices. ‘Those of
us who weren’t given every advantage can make better choices, and
those choices do have the power to affect our
lives…”
There
are echoes in Vance’s biography of the many “hood” oracles that
depict Black life as, without exception, dysfunctional and unbearably
ugly. But in this case, it is white, working class life that is
soaked in alcoholism and threatened by senseless violence.
This
profile, like the book title’s derogation of white workers as
“hillbillies,” is deeply offensive to anyone growing up in a
working class family or community. Vance’s addicted mother and
sometimes absent father are neither exceptional nor common in white
working class families anymore than they are unique to or absent from
families of different ethnicities or socio-economic classes. To
believe otherwise is to feed the ugly monsters of racism and class
arrogance, the twin beasts nurtured by every ruling class.
Growing
up in working class communities, we see the ravages of exploitation,
the divisiveness of racism, and the despair of joblessness and
poverty. Of course, these occasion harmful, counterproductive
behavior. They wreck the lives of many. But they are not remedied by
self-help bromides the likes of which Vance advances.
Capitalism
produces and reproduces wholesale misery that may no longer fall as
unevenly as it has in the past. While African American workers are
continually and relentlessly victimized by racist practices and denied access by exclusionary craft unions, capital
today offers white workers little reward for supporting or tolerating
racist policies. The twenty-first century global economic turmoil has
devastated workers’ standards of living regardless of race or
“choices.”
The
future lies in the hands of those who reject divisive, elite-fashioned
stereotypes and unite to face their common enemy.
Zoltan
Zigedy
I hope that in a future article, you can go into further detail concerning what you call the "self-help bromide" J.D. Vance peddles in his book (an excellent term, by the way) and how the left can counter it more effectively. It is a weapon the exploiters wield to manipulate the exploited through inducing guilt and an opiate used by the exploited to fool themselves into thinking that they have more power than they really do. As is evidenced in the comment section in the WSJ article you linked, it still holds sway over many.
ReplyDelete