The cheapest currency in the US is the award of
‘hero’. At a time noted for its pervasive corruption, moral slack, and
self-regard, the shapers of opinion search far and wide for acts of atypical
goodness that can be heralded as heroic, acts that might paint an inspired
picture in these sordid times.
The bar for doing-good has been set so low that simply
doing what you do or are supposed to do earns hero status: a fireman rescues a
dog and becomes a media hero; a dog rescues a fireman and also becomes a hero.
Really?
In more heroic times, the standard set for hero status
was much higher.
A hero should be someone who stands up for those whose
voices are not heard; a hero ought to be a person casting personal interest
aside to confront a bully.
I thought about this question when I saw a picture of
a young African American couple mourning the loss of Heather Heyer, the victim
of a brutal attack in Charlottesville, Virginia. Because she was standing
against the forces of injustice when her life was taken, isn’t she a hero by
any standard?
I was reminded of another young woman, Rachel Corrie,
who was killed in Israel while standing for justice for Palestinians. Isn’t she
a hero? Should we not hold her memory close and tell others of her heroism?
Perhaps measured by different standards, I would count
Colin Kaepernick worthy of hero stature as well. While he has not given his
life for the cause of racial justice, he risked his career in professional
football to make a statement against institutional racism-- especially
persistent police violence against Black people-- before millions of people. As
part of the National Football League elite, Kaepernick stepped far over the
close line of propriety set by the Neanderthals who own and administer the
sport that captures the worst elements of public life in the US. If brutal,
bloody public entertainments in arenas became a symbol of decadent Rome, then
surely the Sunday celebrations of violence and their accompanying mass hysteria
in stadia serve to celebrate the decay of public life in our own US empire.
Because Kaepernick decided to forego the vulgar
pre-game ritual of mindless patriotism and slavish conformity of fall Sundays,
he has brought down the ire of the man-child “sportsmen” who own the NFL and
its teams. This group of privileged white businessmen enjoy the financial
benefits of a sport constructed from base sentiments of aggression and
dominance. The sport’s creative directors have understood the value of
connecting untempered violence with an equally base and artificial loyalty to a
wholly constructed collective-- a “team” -- assembled from entirely disparate
parts. Unmistakably, they have successfully replicated the centuries-old
attachment of martial sacrifice and ignorant allegiance to an ensemble of vapid
symbols. By scorning the NFL’s ritual and, in the minds of many, the symbolic
pledge of unexamined loyalty to the national warmongers, Kaepernick and a
handful of other African American players have loosened the emotional glue that
holds the entire sordid artifice together.
To Kaepernick’s credit, his anti-racist gesture
attacked the most vulnerable link in the chain holding the NFL together, the
explicit worship of blind, unfounded loyalty to team and country: the national
anthem. Kaepernick chose to protest police violence against Black people by
refusing the long-established custom of standing while the national anthem is
played.
That the owners understood this relationship between
cheap patriotism and team devotion was demonstrated by the tawdry exploitation
of the death in combat of Pat Tillman. Anyone engaged in the NFL industry would
likely notice that for all the flag waving, war glorification, and exalted
patriotism exhibited at football games, there was a scarcity of volunteers
emerging from NFL ranks for the past two decades’ many wars. Owners,
administrators, sportswriters, players, and hangers-on were seldom
inspired to enlist or offer up their own sons or daughters. So, when Pat
Tillman turned his back on his lucrative player contract and joined the Army,
NFL royalty jumped at the opportunity to associate NFL warrior-talk with the
actual sacrifice of a member of their tough-guy community. Tillman was
celebrated far and wide, stadium to stadium, as the NFL role model. And when he
was killed in Afghanistan, the tributes and honors grew even more. The entire
NFL basked in the sun reflected by Tillman’s heroism. But when Tillman’s death
was exposed as a result of friendly fire, when his mother revealed that Tillman
had grown vocally critical of the war, the NFL decided that Tillman was not the
kind of hero that benefited the interests of the NFL. Consequently, the NFL is
left with no “heroes” from the US’s unending wars. Tillman became our hero and
not theirs.
Not only are the NFL owners embarrassing chicken
hawks, but they are rapacious, predatory capitalists as well. They have
parlayed extraordinary popularity into an economic entity that guarantees
increasing profit and asset value, but with absolutely no risk, a secure status
even better than that enjoyed by the megabanks. Since teams are merely
franchises granted by NFL nobility, much of the real asset value resides in the
infrastructure, the stadia, which is largely paid for out of public funds-- not
from the pockets of ticket holders or fans, but from the general public. Up
until 2015, the NFL was an unincorporated, nonprofit association paying no
taxes, though the teams pay taxes on their profits.
And just in case fans would note that they are paying
for the stadia and recognize that owners add nothing and are of no genuine use,
Congress has ordained that public ownership will never be an option.
Incredibly, an industry with 70% Black players refuses
employment to a proven, competent African American player because he uses a
pre-game gesture to draw attention to injustices against Blacks. Of course,
that shameful response should come with little surprise since the arrogant
white owners have a long history of racial insensitivities, if not bald-faced
racism. Long after most ugly stereotypes were banished from acceptance, owners
thought that Black quarterbacks were insufficiently intelligent to lead a
professional team. African American head coaches and management was nearly non-existent until the League
was shamed into adopting the “Rooney rule,” which obligated teams to interview
Black applicants for open coaching positions, a pathetic public relations-induced
gesture.
Of course, the owners see the players as little more
than high-priced chattel. As knowledge of the severe, debilitating, often
mortal effects of football violence became widespread, the owners did
everything to suppress the facts.
While Colin Kaepernick is blacklisted from playing in
the NFL, others have taken up his cause and the cause of justice for African Americans.
Richard Sherman has been outspoken and his teammate Michael Bennett has
followed Kaepernick’s example by remaining seated during the playing of the
national anthem. Bennett has vocally called out white players to join the
protest. Several white teammates have shown support for his action, though none
have remained seated. Hopefully, some will show some courage and join the
protest, especially some of the hyper-salaried, elite white quarterbacks who
usually identify closely with the owners. That will make a difference.
I
urge all to sign the online petition/pledge circulated by MoveOn.org calling for a boycott of the
NFL in support of Colin Kaepernick. With fan interest waning last year, the NFL
is sensitive to a decline in its fan support.Greg Godels (Zoltan Zigedy)
zzsblogml@gmail.com
2 comments:
Excellent article. Im currently devouing all your superb work. Maybe a revisit some of the "old" theoretical questions, or some new ones? Those are of extremly good quality. One of your best article is when you reemphasize Lenin's "Imperialism, highest stage of capitalism".
I really have to dig deep to find functional communist as yourself in the English speaking world. Last one was Grover Furr.
Comradely greetings, Igor
You make a very telling point about the owners' trying to suppress information on the horrible effects of head injuries. Just wasn't good for business to be upfront, and they finally have acknowledged the issue only after being forced to do so.
Post a Comment